The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) is the European Union’s new, comprehensive regulatory framework aimed at governing crypto-assets and their related services. Whether you’re just beginning to explore the world of crypto regulation, looking to deepen your understanding, or transitioning from a VASP license to the new CASP structure, MiCA will impact how crypto-assets are managed, issued, and serviced across the EU.
These new regulations marks a significant shift in the way businesses handle crypto-assets. Designed to increase consumer protection, ensure market integrity, and foster innovation, MiCA applies to a wide range of entities—from issuers of tokens to crypto-asset service providers (CASPs).
In this guide, we’ll walk you through everything you need to know, whether you’re:
- A business looking to obtain your first license but unsure where to start;
- Someone familiar with MiCA, seeking to deepen your knowledge;
- A current VASP license holder, preparing to transition to the MiCA-regulated framework.
MiCA aims to simplify and unify the fragmented regulatory landscape across Europe, providing crypto businesses with a clear path to compliance while ensuring they can operate cross-border throughout the EU.
The Rise of Cryptocurrency in Europe: From Niche to Necessity
Cryptocurrency’s journey in Europe began as a niche interest among tech enthusiasts and early adopters of blockchain technology. Bitcoin, the first and most well-known cryptocurrency, emerged in 2009, setting the stage for what would eventually become a global revolution in finance. It wasn’t long before Europeans began to take notice, and in 2010, Europe witnessed its first crypto transaction. Early adopters used Bitcoin for cross-border transfers, capitalizing on its decentralized nature.
As Bitcoin gained popularity, so did other forms of digital assets. Between 2013 and 2017, the rise of Ethereum, with its smart contract functionality, broadened the appeal of cryptocurrencies, transforming the market beyond just digital currency to include decentralized applications (dApps) and initial coin offerings (ICOs).
However, the surge in popularity also brought significant risks. A lack of unified regulation across European nations exposed the market to dangers, including fraudulent schemes and unstable exchanges. Global scandals, such as Mt. Gox , Bitconnect , OneCoin , Celsius and most recently, FTX , impacted investors worldwide, including those in Europe. The collapse of these platforms led to billions in lost investments and shook the faith in the crypto market. Recognizing the severity of these issues, Europe took action.
Mt. Gox: One of the earliest and most infamous crypto exchanges, Mt. Gox collapsed in 2014 after a major hack. Approximately 850,000 bitcoins were stolen, worth billions today. The exchange’s collapse severely impacted early trust in cryptocurrency exchanges.
Bitconnect: a high-yield investment program (essentially a Ponzi scheme), promised unrealistic returns through its lending platform. It collapsed in 2018 after regulators issued warnings, leaving investors with massive losses.
OneCoin: was a notorious Ponzi scheme that operated under the guise of a cryptocurrency. It raised billions of dollars worldwide, including from European investors, before it was exposed as fraudulent. Its leaders were arrested, and the scam is considered one of the largest in crypto history.
FTX: Most recently, the collapse of FTX in 2022 shook the global crypto market. Mismanagement, fraud, and poor financial practices led to billions in customer funds being lost, once again eroding trust in exchanges.
Celsius Network: was a cryptocurrency lending platform that promised high interest rates on deposits, attracting millions of users. However, in 2022, the company filed for bankruptcy after it was revealed that risky investment strategies led to massive financial losses, with billions of dollars in user deposits at risk.
By 2017, cryptocurrencies had transitioned from being an underground movement to a mainstream financial innovation. Countries like Switzerland and Estonia became known as crypto-friendly hubs, encouraging blockchain development and adoption through favorable regulation. Switzerland’s “Crypto Valley” in Zug quickly attracted blockchain companies and startups, while Estonia rolled out its e-residency program, which allowed global entrepreneurs to create and manage blockchain-based businesses within its borders.
By introducing MiCA, Europe is taking proactive steps to prevent similar catastrophes within its jurisdiction. New legislation aims to protect investors, maintain market integrity, and set a higher standard of accountability to ensure that such scandals are not repeated on European soil.
What is MiCA Regulation?
The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation is a comprehensive legislative framework introduced by the European Union to regulate the growing cryptocurrency market. MiCA aims to address the challenges posed by the rapidly evolving world of crypto-assets, such as ensuring investor protection, maintaining financial stability, and fostering innovation within the EU’s digital economy. This legislation covers various aspects of crypto-assets, including:
- Issuance of crypto-assets (such as utility tokens, e-money tokens, and asset-referenced tokens).
- Licensing and regulation of crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), ensuring they meet specific standards for operation.
- Consumer protection by enforcing transparency and anti-money laundering (AML) standards.
- Market integrity by mitigating risks associated with fraud, market manipulation, and other illicit activities.
It serves as the first unified regulatory framework specifically designed to create a harmonized approach to crypto-assets across the European Union. It replaces the fragmented regulatory landscape where different countries had varying laws, leading to confusion for businesses and consumers alike.
When MiCA Gained Momentum
The MiCA initiative took shape as a response to the 2017-2018 ICO boom, where Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) exploded in popularity, raising billions but also exposing consumers to significant risks due to the lack of clear regulations. This surge in unregulated activity prompted European regulators to act, recognizing the need to bring order to the market.
In September 2020, the European Commission introduced the draft proposal for MiCA as part of its Digital Finance Package, which aimed to transform Europe into a global hub for financial innovation. This marked the beginning of MiCA’s legislative journey, with the goal of providing legal certainty and creating a level playing field for businesses operating in the crypto space.
The regulation underwent multiple rounds of consultation with stakeholders, including crypto companies, policymakers, and legal experts. By June 2023, MiCA was officially published in the Official Journal of the European Union and began its phased implementation process.
MiCA’s rollout is expected to be fully operational by the end of 2024, providing clear rules for businesses and protecting consumers across all EU member states. However, while some countries will begin applying MiCA in 2025, others may take longer to fully integrate the regulation into their legal frameworks. Some member states plan to begin enforcing new changes later, with the full transition anticipated to be completed by 2026. This phased approach ensures that all jurisdictions can adapt to the new requirements, addressing any operational or regulatory gaps along the way. Despite this gradual transition, MiCA remains a milestone in Europe’s approach to crypto-assets, setting the stage for the future of digital finance.
Who Regulates MiCA?
The regulation and supervision of MiCA fall under the responsibility of several key institutions:
- European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA): ESMA plays a central role in supervising crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) operating across the EU. It ensures compliance with MiCA’s technical standards and enforces rules related to market abuse, transparency, and investor protection.
- National Competent Authorities (NCAs): Each EU member state has its own NCA, such as the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) in France or BaFin in Germany. These authorities are responsible for the licensing and oversight of CASPs operating within their jurisdictions.
- European Banking Authority (EBA): The EBA works alongside ESMA to oversee crypto-asset issuers, particularly those issuing e-money tokens or asset-referenced tokens. The EBA is responsible for ensuring that these issuers comply with the financial regulations and capital requirements under MiCA.
Together, these regulatory bodies ensure that the rules of MiCA are applied consistently across the EU, maintaining a balance between innovation and consumer protection.
Changes in Crypto licensing Under MiCA regulations
The introduction of the MiCA regulation brings significant changes to how businesses, particularly crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), operate within the European Union. Here’s a breakdown of the major shifts businesses will experience compared to previous regulatory frameworks:
New Licensing Requirements Under MiCA Regulations
One of the most significant changes introduced by MiCA is the comprehensive licensing framework for Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs). Unlike the previously fragmented regulations across the EU, this legislation establishes a unified licensing process applicable across all member states, requiring businesses to meet stringent requirements to operate legally.
Here are the key components of the licensing process under new regulations:
1) Capital Requirements
Financial stability of crypto providers becomes a top priority. MiCA sets specific minimum capital requirements based on the types of services provided. The goal is to ensure that companies have enough capital to cover operational risks and maintain market confidence.
For crypto-asset custodians, the minimum capital requirement is €125,000, while exchanges and platforms may need to hold capital in the range of €150,000 to €350,000 depending on their size and scope. Issuers of asset-referenced tokens are subject to even more stringent capital requirements, reflecting the higher risks associated with these instruments. In particular, they must maintain a reserve of assets backing the tokens they issue, which must be regularly audited and transparent to investors
2) Management and Governance Standards
CASPs are required to maintain strict governance and management practices to ensure the sound operation of their business. The management team must meet fit and proper criteria, demonstrating relevant experience, skills, and integrity to oversee crypto operations effectively. In addition to this, MiCA emphasizes the inclusion of local personnel in some jurisdictions, meaning that in certain cases, companies are required to prioritize the hiring of local staff. However, in many EU countries, it is sufficient to hire personnel who are residents of any EU member state, ensuring the company complies with jurisdiction-specific laws and regulatory practices
Furthermore, the company must establish a robust corporate governance framework, which includes well-defined responsibilities, internal controls, and risk management procedures to handle operational and financial risks.
Board composition plays a critical role, with MiCA emphasizing the need for independent directors who can make unbiased decisions in the best interest of the company and its stakeholders. Moreover, companies must appoint a Compliance Officer responsible for implementing anti-money laundering (AML) policies and ensuring full regulatory compliance. This governance structure is designed to enhance transparency and protect consumers, ensuring that CASPs operate safely and efficiently within the regulatory framework
3) Application Process
The MiCA application process is designed to ensure that only well-prepared businesses can operate as CASPs in the European Union. Applicants must submit their request to the National Competent Authority (NCA) in their home country, including a business plan that details the services offered, target markets, and financial projections. The application must also demonstrate compliance with MiCA’s capital requirements, with proof of sufficient financial resources to cover operational risks.
Furthermore, CASPs must outline their internal controls, AML/KYC procedures, and risk management frameworks, including cybersecurity and business continuity measures. Once submitted, the NCA reviews the application in collaboration with ESMA to ensure that all EU-wide standards are met. Successful applicants gain access to the passporting system, allowing them to operate across the EU under a single license
If you are preparing to adapt your business to meet the new CASP license requirements under MiCA, make sure to visit our MiCA Adaptation Guide for detailed information on how Legalaes can assist you throughout the transition process
Services Provided by CASPs Under MiCA
MiCA defines and regulates several essential services provided by Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs). These include the following:
Crypto activity | Description |
---|---|
1. Operation of Trading Platforms | CASPs can operate platforms that match multiple third-party buyers and sellers of crypto-assets. However, they cannot trade on their own account and must ensure transparency and fairness in executing orders. |
2. Exchanging Crypto-Assets | This service allows CASPs to exchange crypto-assets for funds or other crypto-assets. CASPs are required to display prices transparently and execute trades at the agreed-upon prices. |
3. Custody and Administration | CASPs offering custody services must safeguard clients’ crypto-assets or their access keys. They must maintain a clear register of client holdings and ensure segregation of client assets from their own. |
4. Transfer of Crypto-Assets | CASPs can facilitate the transfer of crypto-assets between distributed ledger addresses on behalf of clients. This service does not require the opening of a virtual wallet. |
5. Placing of Crypto-Assets | CASPs may market crypto-assets on behalf of third parties, ensuring transparency in transaction fees, process, and pricing before the asset is placed. |
6. Reception and Transmission of Orders | CASPs can receive and transmit orders for the purchase or sale of crypto-assets. They are obligated to ensure prompt and fair execution of client orders on authorized trading platforms. |
7. Advisory Services | CASPs offering advisory services must ensure that their recommendations are suited to the client’s knowledge, financial situation, and risk tolerance. They must also disclose whether the advice is independent or tied to specific assets. |
Cross-Border Operations and Passporting
One of the most significant advantages introduced by MiCA is the ability for licensed Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) to operate across the European Union under a single authorization, through a process known as passporting. This means that once a CASP is granted a license in one of EU member state, it can extend its operations throughout the entire European Economic Area (EEA) without the need to apply for separate licenses in each country. This unified approach significantly reduces administrative burdens and simplifies compliance for businesses looking to scale across borders.
How Passporting Works Under MiCA:
1) Once a crypto company is licensed as CASP, it automatically eligible to provide its services in other EU and EEA countries without needing additional national authorizations. The NCA that grants the initial license becomes the primary regulator, but the business must notify the NCAs of other countries where it plans to operate.
2) Licensed CASPs can offer various services—such as crypto-asset custody, exchange operations, and token issuance—without worrying about navigating the complexities of differing regulatory frameworks in each country. This significantly lowers the entry barriers for crypto businesses that wish to operate on a broader European scale.
3) While passporting eliminates the need for additional licenses, CASPs must still inform the relevant national authorities (NCAs) in each country they intend to operate in. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) coordinates with NCAs to ensure that services are provided in compliance with MiCA’s standards, and this ensures that consumers are protected across all member states. The NCAs can continue to monitor the activities of passported CASPs, reporting any non-compliance to ESMA
4) Passporting under MiCA does not compromise the regulatory oversight of CASPs. Even though a single license applies across all member states, local regulators retain the ability to monitor operations and impose penalties or sanctions in the event of non-compliance with MiCA’s rules, particularly those concerning consumer protection, market manipulation, and transparency.
5) Previously, businesses operating in multiple jurisdictions faced a fragmented regulatory environment, where different countries had different requirements for licensing, compliance, and reporting. This created inconsistent consumer protections and increased operational complexity for businesses. With MiCA, the introduction of a single regulatory framework replaces this fragmented approach, providing legal certainty and harmonized rules across the EU. This harmonization reduces compliance costs, facilitates smoother operations, and boosts consumer confidence in the crypto-asset sector
Transition Period and National Guidelines
MiCA allows for a potential transition period of up to 18 months for existing VASPs to comply with the new regulations. However, the specifics of how this period will be implemented vary across EU jurisdictions. Some countries may offer grace periods, while others may have stricter timelines for transitioning to the new CASP framework. Companies operating under previous regulations or without a CASP license are still awaiting clear guidance on how to meet the requirements and whether temporary licenses might be issued during this transition.
While the detailed timelines are still pending, companies should proactively begin updating their internal governance structures, compliance frameworks, and documentation to align with MiCA’s regulatory standards to avoid potential delays or issues.
Transitioning to MiCA compliance can seem complex, especially with varying national guidelines. If you’re looking for specific assistance on how your company can adapt, explore our dedicated MiCA Adaptation Page for tailored solutions and expert guidance
Additional Documentation and Compliance Requirements
Beyond obtaining a license, MiCA imposes several ongoing documentation and compliance obligations. These requirements are essential for maintaining transparency, ensuring consumer protection, and mitigating financial risks in the rapidly evolving crypto-asset market.
1) White Paper Obligations
Development of White Paper becomes mandatory for any entity issuing crypto-assets. This document must provide clear, transparent information to potential investors about the nature of the asset, its underlying technology, risks, and the rights attached to the asset. It also must detail the crypto-asset’s functionality, including its use cases, and outline any potential risks associated with the asset’s value or liquidity. Additionally, issuers of asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens must include information on the reserve of assets backing the tokens, along with audit procedures to ensure transparency. White paper must be approved by the National Competent Authority (NCA) before a crypto-asset can be offered to the public. Additionally, issuers must ensure that the white paper is made publicly available, accessible, and understandable to a wide audience.
The white paper requirements differ depending on the type of crypto-asset:
For utility tokens, the white paper must outline the token’s purpose, how it functions, and any associated rights or obligations.
For asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens, the white paper must go further, detailing the mechanism for maintaining the token’s value, the reserve assets backing it, and the redemption process for token holders.
2) Sustainability and Environmental Impact Reporting
One of the more novel requirements under MiCA, particularly for issuers of asset-referenced tokens, is the obligation to disclose the environmental impact of the assets they are issuing. This includes reporting on the energy consumption and sustainability measures associated with the operation of their blockchain networks, especially for consensus mechanisms such as Proof-of-Work (PoW). These disclosures are intended to increase transparency around the environmental footprint of blockchain technologies and align with the broader EU sustainability goals
3) AML and KYC Procedures
Also businesses face stricter anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements. These measures ensure that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) implement robust systems to detect and report suspicious activities related to money laundering, terrorist financing, and other financial crimes. CASPs must develop risk-based procedures for identifying their customers, verifying their identity, and monitoring transactions. Any suspicious activities must be reported to the relevant authorities. Additionally, businesses are required to maintain accurate and comprehensive records of customer transactions for a set period, making it easier for authorities to trace illegal activities
4) Regular Audits and Reporting Obligations
All CASPs must submit regular reports to their NCA to ensure ongoing compliance with new regulations. This includes Financial reports that outline the company’s liquidity, solvency, and capital adequacy. Operational reports that describe how the business is managing risks, such as cybersecurity threats, market volatility, and compliance with consumer protection laws. Sustainability reports for companies involved in asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens, as mentioned above. These reports are submitted at least annually, but NCAs can require more frequent reporting depending on the business’s risk profile and the type of assets they handle
5) Investor Protection and Market Integrity
MiCA emphasizes investor protection by mandating that CASPs adopt policies to ensure fair treatment of customers. This includes ensuring that all marketing communications are accurate, not misleading, and that investors are fully aware of the risks associated with their investments. CASPs must also implement conflict of interest policies to ensure that the business acts in the best interest of its clients, and not for its own gain or that of third parties. To enhance market integrity, MiCA introduces strict rules against market abuse, including insider trading, market manipulation, and the unlawful disclosure of insider information. CASPs are required to implement internal systems that can detect and prevent such activities, further protecting the interests of investors and maintaining the overall health of the market
Assets Not Covered by MiCA Regulation
While the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation covers a broad range of crypto-assets, there are specific assets and financial instruments that are excluded from its scope. These exclusions ensure that MiCA focuses primarily on crypto-assets that have not been regulated under other financial laws.
1. Security Tokens: Crypto-assets that qualify as financial instruments under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) are excluded from MiCA. These include security tokens that confer ownership or rights similar to shares or bonds. Such tokens remain subject to the stricter rules of MiFID II.
2. Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) : MiCA does not apply to central bank-issued currencies, such as the digital euro or other government-backed digital currencies. These are considered legal tender and are governed by central bank regulations rather than MiCA.
3. Deposits and Other Traditional Financial Instruments: MiCA also excludes traditional financial products, such as bank deposits, loans, and insurance products, as these are already covered by existing EU financial regulations like the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Solvency II.
4. Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs): While MiCA does not comprehensively regulate non-fungible tokens (NFTs), if an NFT behaves like a financial asset or can be categorized as a financial instrument, it may fall under other regulatory frameworks. Generally, NFTs focused on art, collectibles, or personal use are excluded from MiCA, but this remains a grey area that could evolve.
Requirements for Issuance of Crypto-Assets and Their Listing
The issuance of crypto-assets, including initial coin offerings (ICOs), must comply with a clear regulatory framework designed to protect investors and ensure market transparency. The regulation imposes specific rules on different types of crypto-assets, with stricter requirements for e-money tokens and asset-referenced tokens due to their greater potential impact on financial stability.
1.General Requirements for Crypto-Asset Issuers
MiCA outlines that all issuers of crypto-assets must follow a standardized process, ensuring transparency and consumer protection. Even in cases where no specific issuer exists, such as decentralized crypto-assets like Bitcoin, MiCA still enforces requirements for the services related to those assets. This ensures that all crypto-assets within the EU market operate under a unified regulatory framework.
2.Crypto-Asset White Paper
One of the key requirements for issuing crypto-assets within the EU is the publication of a white paper. This document must provide critical information about the project, including the issuer’s details, the project’s goals, and associated risks. The whitepaper should cover:
- General information about the issuer and any offerors.
- A detailed description of the project and how raised capital will be used.
- The rights attached to the crypto-assets and the underlying technology.
- Any risks associated with the assets, ensuring potential investors are well-informed.
Note: White paper requirements primarily apply to crypto-assets offered to the general public (non-qualified investors). For assets offered to qualified investors, some exemptions may apply.
3. Marketing Communication and Transparency
All marketing materials and communications surrounding the issuance of crypto-assets must be clear, fair, and not misleading. Organizers of ICOs are expected to act honestly and transparently, disclosing any conflicts of interest and ensuring that their systems meet EU security standards. The information provided to potential investors must align with the content in the whitepaper to avoid any discrepancies or misleading claims.
4. Safeguarding Investors’ Assets
To protect investors, token issuers must implement measures to safeguard the funds collected during an ICO. This may include the use of third-party custodians to ensure that the assets are securely stored and can be returned to investors if necessary. Furthermore, retail investors are granted the right to withdraw their investment within a limited period after purchase, giving them added security and flexibility.
5. Issuance of Asset-Referenced Tokens
Issuers of asset-referenced tokens face additional regulatory scrutiny due to the nature of these tokens. They must be authorized by a supervisory authority within the EU and provide continuous updates to token holders regarding the value of reserve assets and the number of tokens in circulation. Issuers are also required to maintain adequate capital reserves and establish clear governance policies to ensure transparency and the ongoing stability of the token.
Essential Internal Policies for CASPs under MiCA
To ensure full compliance with the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) are required to file various internal policies covering areas such as cybersecurity, AML, governance, outsourcing, and more. These internal policies are designed to mitigate operational, financial, and reputational risks while adhering to EU regulations.
- Programme of Operations
This document outlines the company’s core services, business strategy, target markets, and risk management procedures. It is essential for ensuring operational transparency and regulatory compliance. - Client Information and Best Interest Policy
A policy ensuring that companies operate with clients’ best interests in mind by providing clear, accurate, and non-misleading information. This is key to building trust with clients and minimizing conflicts of interest. - Insurance Policy
CASPs must establish an insurance policy to cover risks associated with the loss of crypto-assets or operational errors. This is critical for mitigating financial risks and protecting both the business and its clients. - ICT Systems Security Policy
This policy focuses on ensuring the security and resilience of the company’s IT infrastructure. It covers cybersecurity protocols, data protection, and systems monitoring to safeguard against external and internal threats. - Market Abuse Monitoring and Reporting Policy – MiCA Article 61(9)
CASPs must actively monitor for market abuse activities and report any suspicious activities to the relevant authorities. This policy helps maintain market integrity and ensure compliance with anti-market manipulation laws.
- Client Crypto-Asset Safeguarding Policy
This policy ensures the safe custody and segregation of client assets, protecting them from loss or misuse. It also mandates regular reporting on the status of client funds. - Conflict of Interest Policy
CASPs must have a framework in place to identify, manage, and disclose any conflicts of interest that could arise between the company and its clients. - Custody Policy
This policy governs how crypto-assets are securely stored and managed. It outlines the controls in place to safeguard assets from unauthorized access or theft. - Order Execution Policy
Ensures that clients’ orders are executed promptly, fairly, and in line with market conditions. This policy also establishes transparency in how client transactions are handled. - AML Policy
The Anti-Money Laundering (AML) policy is a critical document for identifying and reporting any suspicious activities related to money laundering or the financing of terrorism. - Whistleblowing Policy
Establishes procedures for employees to report unethical behavior or regulatory breaches without fear of retaliation.
Conclusion
The introduction of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) represents a significant shift in how crypto-assets and services are regulated across the European Union. Designed to address the challenges posed by the rapidly evolving digital economy, MiCA’s primary focus is on establishing clear rules for transparency, consumer protection, and financial stability.
Key changes include the creation of unified licensing for Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs), stricter requirements for issuers of crypto-assets, and improved frameworks for managing risks associated with market abuse, money laundering, and cybersecurity threats. These changes are aimed at fostering innovation while ensuring that the risks associated with crypto-assets are effectively managed across all EU member states.
In the long term, MiCA is expected to create a more secure and trustworthy environment for investors, bolster consumer confidence, and promote the sustainable growth of the crypto-asset market in the EU. By harmonizing regulations across member states, MiCA will make it easier for businesses to operate cross-border and scale their operations while maintaining a high level of regulatory compliance.
Legal References used for preparation of this article
For readers seeking to explore the full legal texts and detailed regulations behind the MiCA framework, we have compiled a list of essential references. These documents provide the official regulations, guidelines, and legislative details governing crypto-assets within the European Union.
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1114
- Final Report on Draft Technical Standards Specifying Requirements under MiCA – First package
- Final Report on Draft Technical Standards Specifying Requirements under MiCA – Second package
- Draft technical Standards specifying certain requirements in relation to conflicts of interest for CASP under the MiCA
- EBA STATEMENT ON THE APPLICATION OF MICAR TO ARTS AND EMTS